CIRA’s mandate is to develop an overarching disaster prevention, mitigation and management protocol so that governments can respond to evolving and dynamic situations and needs through a structured, responsive and relevant mechanism.
This may tantamount to a colossal challenge but governments need to muster all the resources at its disposal including that from the developmental and private sector. It is CIRA’s vision to bring together all stakeholders, working in an independent capacity that allows for greater mobility but in the end to serve governments a well-founded response mechanism through advocacy, facilitation and mobilization. It our intent to show that such far-reaching cooperation works for the betterment of countries and regions.
The following is a demonstration of our technical scope and will be an evolving mandate. The technical mandate of CIRA has been separated into two intricate divisions internally while this document will present an overview of direction.
While it outlines instructions governing research in order to ensure conformity to organizational mandate, where specified, Research Heads may use their discretion to build a research model for the particular topic in discussion.
Classifications of disasters and contingencies will be in 3 levels:
1A. Forecasting & Preparedness
1B. Administrative Contingencies
1C. Disaster Prevention & Mitigation
Section 1A of the mandate of CIRA involves the “intelligence” aspect where research will be carried out on the cutting-edge of intelligence gathering and evaluation, deep diving into research fields and presenting diverse scenarios on disasters leading to the development of preparedness models.
Evolving research will be employed in building response mechanisms classified as below. Examine each of the categories separately and in relation to shared influences.
Law & Order Continuity Planning
Information Continuity Planning
Civil Admin Continuity Planning
Essential Supplies & Services Continuity Planning
Medical Continuity Planning
Psychological Continuity Planning
Financial Continuity Planning
Business Continuity planning
Education Continuity Planning
Threats to be further classified as mild | medium | severe and research and response approached accordingly. TIP: Threats will culminate with events of forced evacuation and lawlessness, mass death & destruction etc.
A separate research and response model to be deployed as PREVENTIVE with the objective of addressing all likely scenarios which may precipitate a disaster.
Disasters are considered on the premise that they are either man-made or natural. However, the two are complexly inter-related, either one acting is a trigger. The objective of this particular research sub-division is to deep dive into man-made disaster. The research will:
i. Extensively study all Research Fields as listed below in this Brief in relation to the research subject discussed.
ii. Offer exhaustive responses that would avert possible disasters causing directly or as a result of impact from another event.
Research Units and their Heads will approach this field through the scope of societal course correction in the respective subjects, proposing remedial action which would direct the Government towards widely accepted Sustainable Goals, addressing policy, methodology and execution.
National Security including Border Controls
Law & Order | Moral Values
Civil Administration
Domestic Economic Policy
International Relations
Administration of Sri Lankans overseas
Information
Food Security
Essential Supplies & Services
Consumer Welfare
Health Policy & Medical Services
Environmental Management | Climate Change
Urban | Rural Development & Management
Transport
Education
Livelihood | Employment
ICT | Artificial Intelligence
Business
Education | Skills Development & Migration
Renewable Energy | Energy Security
Sustainable Utilization of Resources
Social Cohesion | Reconciliation
Poverty Alleviation
Research and response development will be structured on each identified classification based on the following template:
SCENARIOS
This involves building multiple scenarios and variables for each event with risk assessment charts and how monitoring should happen during dynamic and evolving situations.
TRIGGERS
Here, the triggering of disaster management response will de evaluated and illustrated outlining action for each scenario and how the chain of command will be activated in a time-crucial dynamic situation.
RESPONSE
Each scenario will have built-in, ready-for-action response plans and mechanisms with detailed plans of execution with contingency plans within contingencies. Complete organizational/inter-departmental execution plans with command structures and centers, as well as, deployment and continuity under diverse circumstances and eventualities will be illustrated here. Key responsibilities/timelines/asset distribution & Management etc will be put in place and templated.
3.1 Definition of Research Subject
(This space will be used by research teams to define the subject)
(This space will be used by research teams to define the subject)
3.3.1. Methodology will include how the aspect of ‘intelligence’ be drawn into research mechanism, whereby, in addition to, fact-based findings, the research will also pursue an open-ended, out-of-the-box approach to intelligence gathering that taps into ground realities, leading to dependable prognosis and forecasting.
3.3.2. Methodology will include the illustrated parameters of the Research and the Road Map to how the research will be conducted. Methodology will also illustrate research protocols | governance | authenticity | ownership | hierarchy.
3.3.3. Methodology will examine and report the need and implementation of creating Research Cells in all important governmental institutions relevant to different Subject Fields affecting the subject of Research. All our long-term interventions are intended to be channeled through relevant departments and institutes through respective governments, as we are playing a supplementary role in ensuring national preparedness.
3.3.4. Timelines will facilitate data collection | literature surveys |analysis | interviews | modeling | testing and reporting.
Project outcomes will be clearly defined as per the overall scope and parameters set by the Board of Governors.